-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
study CBOR-LD #16
Comments
Note also that the JSON-LD working group had plans about CBOR, but unfortunately not enough time/momentum to finalize this work: The two documents have different focus and priorities, but should not be seen as contradicting each other (at least IMO, @msporny may have a different opinion). Digital Bazaar's document is more focused on using CBOR to compress JSON-LD as efficiently as possible. On the other hand, the WG's document was more focused on allowing to interpret virtually any CBOR document as Linked Data. Ideally, the compression aspects would have been addressed in Section 4, where the content from Digital Bazaar's document could have been integrated. |
For other casts of binary data standards to RDF, see
|
I think everyone here should become familiar with CBOR-LD, which is another closely related, binary representation format.
As per ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes#8 (comment) by @msporny :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: