Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

study CBOR-LD #16

Open
VladimirAlexiev opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

study CBOR-LD #16

VladimirAlexiev opened this issue May 31, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Contributor

I think everyone here should become familiar with CBOR-LD, which is another closely related, binary representation format.

As per ietf-wg-httpapi/mediatypes#8 (comment) by @msporny :

@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

Note also that the JSON-LD working group had plans about CBOR, but unfortunately not enough time/momentum to finalize this work:
https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-cbor/

The two documents have different focus and priorities, but should not be seen as contradicting each other (at least IMO, @msporny may have a different opinion). Digital Bazaar's document is more focused on using CBOR to compress JSON-LD as efficiently as possible.

On the other hand, the WG's document was more focused on allowing to interpret virtually any CBOR document as Linked Data. Ideally, the compression aspects would have been addressed in Section 4, where the content from Digital Bazaar's document could have been integrated.

@gkellogg gkellogg added the UCR Issue on Use Case/Recommendation label Jun 4, 2022
@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Contributor Author

For other casts of binary data standards to RDF, see

@gkellogg gkellogg removed the UCR Issue on Use Case/Recommendation label Jul 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants