-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Insertion not done when occurring in separator of repetition #10
Comments
Thanks Gunther,
I’m currently on vacation and will look at this when I return in about a week. Might be worth adding some tests to the iXML test suite.
…Sent from my iPad
On 27 May 2024, at 20:34, Gunther Rademacher ***@***.***> wrote:
GuntherRademacher/markup-blitz#10 mentions several alternate formulations of a rule that includes an insertion as part of the separator of a repetition.
I happened to try those on jwiXML.xhtml, and found that for none of those variants the insertion is actually done. In contrast to that, the variant shown in GuntherRademacher/markup-blitz#9, where the insertion is in a separate rule, works as expected.
Just thought you might want to know. Thanks for supplying the webpage, by the way.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Funny that
gives But in your example #10 I get a result:
Removing the attribute mark on More intriguingly:
gives
but uncommenting the
even though the |
I've found the error - the compiling of the rules into canonical form builds |
GuntherRademacher/markup-blitz#10 mentions several alternate formulations of a rule that includes an insertion as part of the separator of a repetition.
I happened to try those on jwiXML.xhtml, and found that for none of those variants the insertion is actually done. In contrast to that, the
b-list
shown in GuntherRademacher/markup-blitz#9, where the insertion is in a separate rule, works as expected.Just thought you might want to know. Thanks for providing the webpage, by the way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: