How to replace ObjectJointRevolute2D with GenericJoint

[ManuelZ]

While trying to get the joint reaction forces of this mechanism (which has 0 DOF and is being solved with SolveStatic):

...my first thought was to get the information from the joints, but you said that "CObjectJointRevolute2D has currently no output variables" (although in that case, the question was about positions).

A GenericJoint joint seems to provide a ForceLocal output variable, so I may just replace my RevoluteJoint2D with it, however I'm having doubts about if I should do it like this:

GenericJoint(
    constrainedAxes = [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0],
    ...
)

Would this be correct?

I'm asking, in part, because you also said "The rotation is not available in JointRevolute2D, as the 2D revolute joint can also be attached to position-based markers, which have no rotation." But I can see rotation being available in GenericJoint. So a JointRevolute2D may be more involved than just defining the constrained freedoms?

[jgerstmayr]

This was still open and not answered. But it is generally correct, to use a GenericJoint in this case. However, it leads to more constraint equations, as it always produces 6 equations.