Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2018. It is now read-only.

Schemas with deep nesting is more common than we thought #31

Open
glassfishrobot opened this issue May 20, 2004 · 4 comments
Open

Schemas with deep nesting is more common than we thought #31

glassfishrobot opened this issue May 20, 2004 · 4 comments

Comments

@glassfishrobot
Copy link

We've been seeing reports from users saying that they have to work with a schema
that has a very deep nested structure.

JAXB 1.0 produces the nested interfaces for such elements/types, and as a result
it produces names too long to be used. In fact, the complaints were that the
class file name becomes so long that it goes beyond the OS limit.

Currently, there's no workaround for this problem.
I wonder if the EG could consider this problem in JAXB 2.0.

Environment

Operating System: All
Platform: All

Affected Versions

[1.0]

@glassfishrobot
Copy link
Author

Reported by kohsuke

@glassfishrobot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot
Copy link
Author

kohsuke said:
Wrong link. The correct link is:
https://jaxb.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=3304

@glassfishrobot
Copy link
Author

This issue was imported from java.net JIRA JSR222-31

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants