You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2024. It is now read-only.
Started the operator from the main branch and deploy the manifest above
Wait until the Backstage application pod is ready.
Actual behavior
The documentation in 1.1 depicts the URL naming format (used for backend.baseUrl, app.baseUrl and backend.cors.origin) as: https://backstage-<CUSTOM_RESOURCE_NAME>-<NAMESPACE_NAME>.<OPENSHIFT_INGRESS_DOMAIN>.
But if we look at the Route created by the operator on main, it now has the following naming format: https://<CUSTOM_RESOURCE_NAME>-backstage-<NAMESPACE_NAME>.<OPENSHIFT_INGRESS_DOMAIN>
Expected behavior
Changing the URL format will break users' configurations, as they will need to change them manually to make it work properly with the Route created by the Operator.
As discussed during the previous working group call, we decided to revert to the previous URL format on 1.1, to make sure not to introduce breaking changes. No doc change will therefore be required.
Any logs, error output, etc?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
/kind bug
What versions of software are you using?
Operator version: latest commit on main: c889b0e
OpenShift Local:
How did you run the operator exactly?
Details
Actual behavior
The documentation in 1.1 depicts the URL naming format (used for
backend.baseUrl
,app.baseUrl
andbackend.cors.origin
) as:https://backstage-<CUSTOM_RESOURCE_NAME>-<NAMESPACE_NAME>.<OPENSHIFT_INGRESS_DOMAIN>
.But if we look at the Route created by the operator on main, it now has the following naming format:
https://<CUSTOM_RESOURCE_NAME>-backstage-<NAMESPACE_NAME>.<OPENSHIFT_INGRESS_DOMAIN>
Expected behavior
Changing the URL format will break users' configurations, as they will need to change them manually to make it work properly with the Route created by the Operator.
As discussed during the previous working group call, we decided to revert to the previous URL format on 1.1, to make sure not to introduce breaking changes. No doc change will therefore be required.
Any logs, error output, etc?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: