image_enhance attributte not present

[Ankit12063]

it's saying module 'fprmodules.enhancement' has no attribute 'image_enhance'

[KaiWangCanada]

same issue

[SuryaRam1592]

Same Issue

[tawhidwasik08]

So, here is the issue .. this repo uses this repo for enhancing the fingerprint. As it is suggested, you have to clone the repo in src/fprmodules/enhancement folder. But the problem is I believe enhancement repo is since been updated so that it doesn't have function image_enhance.

You can try the following:

1. Copy FingerprintImageEnhancer.py from src/ folder of the enhancement repo to src/fprmodules/enhancement/ folder
2. In utils.py add from fprmodules.enhancement.FingerprintImageEnhancer import FingerprintImageEnhancer
3. In utils.py rewrite def enhance_image(): as
   

def enhance_image(image):
    image_enhancer = FingerprintImageEnhancer() 
    img_e = image_enhancer.enhance(image)
    img_e = np.asarray(img_e, dtype="uint8")
    return cv2.normalize(img_e, None, alpha=0, beta=255, norm_type=cv2.NORM_MINMAX, dtype=0)

Though right now I am seeing some decrease in performance as well as seeing different outcome for enhanced_image.

[Ankit12063]

Thanks but i have already solved this problem

…

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, 12:16 Tawhid Wasik, ***@***.***> wrote: So, here is the issue .. this repo uses this <https://github.com/Utkarsh-Deshmukh/Fingerprint-Enhancement-Python> repo for enhancing the fingerprint. As it is suggested, you have to clone the repo in *src/fprmodules/enhancement* folder. But the problem is I believe enhancement repo is since been updated so that it doesn't have function image_enhance. You can try the following: 1. copy FingerprintImageEnhancer.py from src/ folder of the enhancement repo to src/fprmodules/enhancement/ folder 2. In utils.py add from fprmodules.enhancement.FingerprintImageEnhancer import FingerprintImageEnhancer 3. In utils.py rewrite def enhance_image add image_enhancer = FingerprintImageEnhancer() img_e = image_enhancer.enhance(image) img_e = np.asarray(img_e, dtype="uint8") Right now I see some decrease in performance though after this. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQ6GGU6VZWEDV5MFPMHV5ULTT3N3VANCNFSM4YCJSGAQ> .

[tawhidwasik08]

Nice !
Did you use the mentioned dataset ? If yes, could you kindly tell me how much accuracy you are getting in identification and verification scenarios ?

[Ankit12063]

Yes, i am using the same dataset. You can check my github profile for accuracy

…

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, 16:26 Tawhid Wasik, ***@***.***> wrote: Nice ! Did you use the mentioned dataset ? If yes, could you kindly tell me how much accuracy you are getting in identification and verification scenarios ? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQ6GGUYL3UROFCAEU3FC573TT4LHVANCNFSM4YCJSGAQ> .