Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What if the filesystem implementation just made calling the client API functions easy? #38

Open
korydraughn opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

What if the filesystem implementation just made calling the client API functions easy? #38

korydraughn opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@korydraughn
Labels
performance question Further information is requested
Milestone
0.2.0

Comments

@korydraughn
Copy link
Collaborator

korydraughn commented Jan 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

The IRODSFilesystem implementation attempts to follow the C++17 standard by performing various checks before invoking the iRODS API (e.g. rcDataObjRename). The server likely performs those checks already, so clients pay the penalty of those checks twice.

Let's investigate just calling the rc-functions directly?
@korydraughn korydraughn added performance question Further information is requested labels Jan 24, 2025
@korydraughn korydraughn self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@korydraughn korydraughn added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@korydraughn korydraughn

Labels
performance question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@korydraughn