-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Privval protocol incompatibility with namada node #817
Comments
No idea what's happening here. I would recommend avoiding leaping to conclusions like some outright incompatibility between CometBFT and TMKMS (or rather, the These issues are unfortunately painful to reproduce without us setting up an entire testnet node for every chain which experiences them, so I'd appreciate your patience in trying to narrow it down without us having to do that. Ideally if you could provide access to a preconfigured node we could debug which has a full development environment for Rust and the TMKMS source code, that would be helpful. |
FWIW, this isn't necessarily due to a schema mismatch. I also notice the error looks like a Rust panic, so it's coming from the Namada node, not CometBFT. Any idea where that's happening or what Protobuf it's trying to parse? Perhaps use |
Also, any idea when Namada will upgrade to CometBFT v0.38? |
Please try TMKMS v0.14.0-pre.1 |
Im using tmkms v0.13.0 with a namada node (which is using cometbft 0.37.0 under the hood).
Running tmkms I get the following error:
And then the namada full node crashes, probably trying to deserialize some protobuf encoded message as I see these kind of message on the full node:
or
Do you know if
tmkms
is compatible with cometbft 0.37.0? if not, is this planned?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: