Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request:Different versions for smaller icons #11

Open
bogdamel opened this issue Mar 27, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request:Different versions for smaller icons #11

bogdamel opened this issue Mar 27, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@bogdamel
Copy link

Small icons in this pack have the same look as their bigger counterparts, so in some cases, it's hard to distinguish them.

image

For example standard Windows 11 Icons have smaller versions which are better for viewing

image

Can you make smaller versions where it is possible?

image
image

As an example icon from another pack

@nouvist
Copy link
Contributor

nouvist commented Mar 9, 2023

I think that will take enormous effort to recreate each of all icons. and we don't really know how to make script to convert batch SVGs with variant yet anyway.

@l3xrom
Copy link

l3xrom commented Nov 10, 2023

In my opinion, for such cases, you can specify in the file naming template to add "small" or "s" to the name or the sizes "16px", "32px" after variant number, also separated by dashes. Clarify the guideline for small svg variants and maybe make a template for them, e.g. base_small.ai .

This may contribute to the appearance of such variants for existing SVGs, and new ones will be created using this guide.

@davidvkimball
Copy link

For what it's worth, the biggest reason I wouldn't consider using this library is that there aren't unique icons for each size. I understand it's an enormous amount of effort to do, but this is why I made the icons the way I did on ElevenForum.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants