We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It seems we may have some errors in the CMA-ES implementation.
For instance, when calculating covariance matrix update (https://github.com/icaros-usc/pyribs/blob/master/ribs/emitters/opt/_cma_es.py#L264), we don't multiply by the sum of the weights, but it looks like they do this in pycma (https://github.com/CMA-ES/pycma/blob/master/cma/purecma.py#L417). This does not matter since the weights sum to 1 anyway, but this would be an issue when implementing active CMA-ES (#85).
As such, we should go thru the CMA-ES implementation and check that it matches the purecma implementation in pycma.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This value is always one. But we should add this when we implement active-CMA-ES.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Description
It seems we may have some errors in the CMA-ES implementation.
For instance, when calculating covariance matrix update (https://github.com/icaros-usc/pyribs/blob/master/ribs/emitters/opt/_cma_es.py#L264), we don't multiply by the sum of the weights, but it looks like they do this in pycma (https://github.com/CMA-ES/pycma/blob/master/cma/purecma.py#L417). This does not matter since the weights sum to 1 anyway, but this would be an issue when implementing active CMA-ES (#85).
As such, we should go thru the CMA-ES implementation and check that it matches the purecma implementation in pycma.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: