Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DID Doc path to indy-vdr-proxy #23

Open
andrewwhitehead opened this issue Mar 13, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Add DID Doc path to indy-vdr-proxy #23

andrewwhitehead opened this issue Mar 13, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@andrewwhitehead
Copy link
Member

Synthesize a DID Doc by fetching the key and endpoint for a DID

@andrewwhitehead
Copy link
Member Author

On hold until DID Core specification advances, to avoid getting locked into a non-standard format.

@c2bo
Copy link
Member

c2bo commented Feb 15, 2022

There was some discussion on the topic of synthesizing a DID Doc in the scope of the did:indy implementation. My current understanding would be that the desired outcome would be for indy-vdr to directly support providing a did document (via native API calls and also via the proxy).

With the did:indy spec, there needs to be some discussion on the functionality of such an additional layer in indy-vdr:

  • Should this be part of indy-vdr or somewhere further up in the aries implementations
  • How much validating should be done in indy-vdr (e.g. https://github.com/dbluhm/pydid)

I think it makes sense to use this issue to discuss these aspects @domwoe @swcurran ? My opinion would be:

  • Provide a call for a did doc natively in indy-vdr via additional API
  • Do very minimal checking here

@c2bo
Copy link
Member

c2bo commented Feb 15, 2022

Our current plan is to start with a did:indy compliant implementation for did docs here: https://github.com/IDunion/indy-did-resolver and move parts into indy-vdr after some testing.

@c2bo
Copy link
Member

c2bo commented Jul 29, 2022

I guess this can be closed with #84?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants