Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License #8

Open
thisandagain opened this issue Jan 25, 2013 · 7 comments
Open

License #8

thisandagain opened this issue Jan 25, 2013 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@thisandagain
Copy link
Contributor

It would be great to get an OSS license sorted out for this project. Personally I would love to see MIT/X11. 😉

@bobthecow
Copy link
Contributor

My vote would be MIT license for the code, some flavor of CC for the data?

@thisandagain
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC-by-SA seems reasonable.

@bobthecow
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @reneejustrenee @nickpinkston Thoughts on a data license?

@bobthecow
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe throw NC on the data license to discourage people from scraping the database to spam business owners about commercial interests?

@thisandagain
Copy link
Contributor Author

If someone wants to spam a license isn't going to stop them. NC hurts the ability for upstanding businesses to leverage the platform.

@nickpinkston
Copy link

I'm definitely down for MIT on the code, and I'm firmly against adding NC to the data license because of the hurt to business. There's already ThomasNet if you want to scrape a vast list of people for spamming. What if MakeZine, etc. wanted to use the data - I don't think we should stop them or anyone else. Nearly all the people who want to start a business in the maker space have the best intentions.

@bobthecow
Copy link
Contributor

Cool. I'll add MIT license to the repo. I'm not sure where or how to list the license for the data though.

bobthecow added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants