Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The package structure should be improved #18

Open
clinuxrulz opened this issue May 12, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

The package structure should be improved #18

clinuxrulz opened this issue May 12, 2016 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@clinuxrulz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@DanielGronau
Copy link
Collaborator

DanielGronau commented Jul 10, 2016

@clinuxrulz You wrote somewhere that you like the idea to follow roughly the Haskell structure, and I think this is a good starting point. I'll do this for Data, So e.g. Ord will go to org.highj.data.ord etc.

I'm not sure about the type-classes, those had to go under org.highj.control when we want to follow the Haskell structure.

Further, I'll move all helper classes like Strings from the function package to util (at least for now)

@clinuxrulz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sounds good for org.highj.data.* for Data stuff. And we don't have to follow Haskell's layout exactly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants