Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve the communication protocol to either return only the code from the run command or a verbose output #4

Open
henrybarreto opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Improve the communication protocol to either return only the code from the run command or a verbose output #4

henrybarreto opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request fix This need to be fixed urgent

Comments

@henrybarreto
Copy link
Owner

Currently, the whole output from the command in sent to client at once.

Giving the option to return only the result code and refactoring the code to work with large outputs, are essential to the application.
@henrybarreto henrybarreto added enhancement New feature or request fix This need to be fixed urgent labels Sep 27, 2021
@henrybarreto henrybarreto self-assigned this Sep 28, 2021
@henrybarreto henrybarreto removed their assignment Sep 28, 2021
@henrybarreto henrybarreto changed the title Improve the communication procol to either return only the return code or a verbose output Improve the communication protocol to either return only the return code or a verbose output Sep 28, 2021
@henrybarreto henrybarreto changed the title Improve the communication protocol to either return only the return code or a verbose output Improve the communication protocol to either return only the code from the run command or a verbose output Oct 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request fix This need to be fixed urgent
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@henrybarreto