Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update record mapping for rpbIds and cleanup rpbId mapping for zdbId #2107

Open
TobiasNx opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor

TobiasNx commented Dec 5, 2024

records with rpbId and hbzId

in lobd: 13739 vs: in rpb: 47177

ZDB ID and rpbId
In lobd: 7260 vs in rpb: 3879

We have 22087 records in the rpb collection.

Also there are 26 records that have are not part of the NZ but are in the rpb collection.

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also there are 26 records that have are not part of the NZ but are in the rpb collection.

These seems mainly to be wrong mappings assigning records to CZ Consor Records instead of ZDB/NZ Records (20 instances). These can easily be fixed:

---
almaMmsId: "99370691768806441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024538" -> HT015612364 -> 990170549260206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370695565206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01074757" ->  HT017735962 -> 990197983170206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370695975906441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01041072" -> HT016926066 -> 990188172110206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370696004506441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01040576" -> HT017379813 -> 990192906610206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370685222206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01076749" -> HT019971887 -> 990227800790206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686223506441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024509" -> HT015817615 -> 990173331820206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686223106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01034047" -> HT016225491 -> 990178421190206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370688114906441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01034103" -> HT016306054 -> 990179419420206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370698952906441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "107t081447" -> HT015495978 -> 990165399670206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686737106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024554" -> HT015817675 -> 990173332420206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370688948206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01076258" -> HT019149553 -> 990214114060206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370683064406441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024500" -> HT015941280 -> 990174711090206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370683584806441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01044786" -> HT016965533 -> 990188584160206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370685807106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01076681" -> HT014169524 -> 990133002700206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370685802706441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01038384" -> HT016490325 -> 990181886860206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370696006406441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01040707" -> HT017446139 -> 990193588700206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370688470706441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "036t051384" -> HT016046758 -> 990176510200206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370697499206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01044794" -> HT017427689 -> 990193391480206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686789106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01038436" -> HT016388625 -> 990180824070206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686790306441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01038805" -> HT016515187 -> 990182143410206441


---
almaMmsId: "99370690340106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01045608" -> HT017692163 -> 990197311930206441

But 5 mappings seem unclear to me, probably need help by @acka47 or @fsteeg or RPB to identify the correct lobid record:

---
almaMmsId: "99370777663406441"
rpbId: "929t993448"  -> ist das die elektronische version? kann man elektronische Versionen in der RPB erkennen? Ich vermute, dass es die Printausgabe ist,
unter der almaMmsId is ein Consor CZ Titel.


---
almaMmsId: "99370693599306441"
rpbId: "036t980990" -> ist das die elektronische version? kann man elektronische Versionen in der RPB erkennen? Ich vermute, dass es die Printausgabe ist,
unter der almaMmsId is ein Consor CZ Titel.


---
almaMmsId: "990019846300106470"  -> Das schein ein lokaler Titel zu sein. Dürfte nicht zur RPB gehören.
hbzId: "HT017502667"

---
almaMmsId: "990000167930306443"  -> Das schein ein lokaler Titel zu sein. Dürfte nicht zur RPB gehören.
rpbId: "929t062907" -> HT006908366 -> 990054811920206441 (evtl dieser als Ersatz)


---
almaMmsId: "990027794510206443"  -> Das schein ein lokaler Titel zu sein. Dürfte nicht zur RPB gehören.
hbzId: "HT017502667" 

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant