You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Still need to implement reduce for #24. After unsuccessfully banging my head against the wall for a while I'm gravitating towards thinking that reduce should be the basis of everything (and forEach is merely a reduce that accumulates Noise), but it's rather involved and I need to let the idea sink in, because I want to get things right this time around. The issue is here is just a reminder.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Will it cause problems if the compiler is able to (if it ever will) check for pureness of the reducer? Or is it just about the internals? Because I prefer having separated forEach and reduce in the public API
Oh, yeah. In the public API they should be separate things. My point is rather that implementing reduce over forEach is actually trickier than the other way around.
Still need to implement reduce for #24. After unsuccessfully banging my head against the wall for a while I'm gravitating towards thinking that
reduce
should be the basis of everything (andforEach
is merely a reduce that accumulatesNoise
), but it's rather involved and I need to let the idea sink in, because I want to get things right this time around. The issue is here is just a reminder.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: