You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which OS do you use? Linux
Which version of GHC do you use and how did you install it? GHC 9.10.1
How is your project built (alternative: link to the project)? standalone
Which LSP client (editor/plugin) do you use? Neovim+lspconfig
Which version of HLS do you use and how did you install it? I picked latest commit, so f09500b because I was excited to test.
Have you configured HLS in any way (especially: a hie.yaml file)? standalone files
Your environment
Which OS do you use? Linux
Which version of GHC do you use and how did you install it? GHC 9.10.1
How is your project built (alternative: link to the project)? standalone
Which LSP client (editor/plugin) do you use? Neovim+lspconfig
Which version of HLS do you use and how did you install it? I picked latest commit, so f09500b because I was excited to test.
Have you configured HLS in any way (especially: a
hie.yaml
file)? standalone filesSteps to reproduce
The following code:
Expected behaviour
I would like inlay hint for the implicit fields of constructors
Foo
andFooM
when definingfoo
andfooM
.More generally, it seems that inlay hints are not shown for record field when the record does have type parameters.
Actual behaviour
I only have inlay hint for
Foo/foo
but not forFoo/fooM
:I also tried to add type signature and monomorphise
FooM
:Debug information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: