You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the primary resource should come first: the language definition. It is the only authoritative document on Haskell, right? Since the reference is short, it can easily be moved to top of the page. All other resources (tutorials, etc.) are secondary. (Well, compiler-dependent language extensions are somewhere in between.)
Well maybe it shows that I've done too much teaching. First thing I have my students do, regularly, is find and bookmark authoritative definitions of programming languages they are using.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your students are lucky that they are supported by a teacher. ;-) The first thing newbies ask is what Haskell book to get for learning, only later does having the report as a reference enter the picture, and then it's right there on that page. I made this page so obviously I think the order of this content is appropriate. Deferring for input from other people.
I think the primary resource should come first: the language definition. It is the only authoritative document on Haskell, right? Since the reference is short, it can easily be moved to top of the page. All other resources (tutorials, etc.) are secondary. (Well, compiler-dependent language extensions are somewhere in between.)
Well maybe it shows that I've done too much teaching. First thing I have my students do, regularly, is find and bookmark authoritative definitions of programming languages they are using.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: