You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is often difficult for industry practitioners to evaluate the conformity of Policy implementations of methodologies with 'official' methodology definitions usually published as pdf documents. #3408 enables users to correlate calculations implemented in the policy with mathematical formulas in these documents. Additionally, specialist 'certification' organisations with both technical and methodology knowledge could offer such assurances by reviewing policies and their corresponding methodologies and publishing their assessments as tags. At present these tags can be assigned to the policy as a whole or some structural elements of the policy such as:
Modules
Tools
Schemas
This granularity is insufficient in some cases as sections of workflows (which bind together schemas, modules, tools, sequences of steps and various conditions/rules) should also be gradable. This is because they often represent individually significant activities and project types.
Requirements
Introduce the capability to select arbitrary sections of Policy workflows and then assign tags to them, which should result in these tags being visible whenever the policy sections or any artefacts produced in these sections are viewed by users such that:
Policy sections can be selected and assessed/tagged after the policy is published
Assessment/tagging can be done by users who are not policy authors
Tags then applied retrospectively to artefacts produced by the 'target' section of the Policy (where the tag has been applied)
Tags are visible whenever users view artefacts and/or policy in Guardian and Indexer, including trustchain view
Definition of done
The requirements above are fulfilled
The functionality is documented
At least one practical example exists in the policies in the Guardian github repository
Acceptance criteria
Users can get more clarity on the scope of methodology coverage of a Policy by examining the 'certification' tags on its sections, elements and/or policy as a whole.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem description
It is often difficult for industry practitioners to evaluate the conformity of Policy implementations of methodologies with 'official' methodology definitions usually published as pdf documents. #3408 enables users to correlate calculations implemented in the policy with mathematical formulas in these documents. Additionally, specialist 'certification' organisations with both technical and methodology knowledge could offer such assurances by reviewing policies and their corresponding methodologies and publishing their assessments as tags. At present these tags can be assigned to the policy as a whole or some structural elements of the policy such as:
This granularity is insufficient in some cases as sections of workflows (which bind together schemas, modules, tools, sequences of steps and various conditions/rules) should also be gradable. This is because they often represent individually significant activities and project types.
Requirements
Introduce the capability to select arbitrary sections of Policy workflows and then assign tags to them, which should result in these tags being visible whenever the policy sections or any artefacts produced in these sections are viewed by users such that:
Definition of done
Acceptance criteria
Users can get more clarity on the scope of methodology coverage of a Policy by examining the 'certification' tags on its sections, elements and/or policy as a whole.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: