-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
future support #4
Comments
I am not sure what else I can add to the project. This project was started as challenge to myself to come up with easy to use standalone IOT network (no WiFi required) with least amount of power consumption for sensor nodes. If you have issues please let me know and I will try to resolve it. |
Fantastic, thanks, I am now concentrating on finding out the reason for loss of some packets (probe requests) that are not received by the gateway (around 2%) I live in a rural area and external interference is not an issue. Any ideas? I built a single sender- receiver platform without any extra stuff and am hunting the lost packets. Will let you know more, but it will make time , I am not very versed in WireShark. Thanks again. |
I remember last year I ran a test with 1 gateway and 3 slaves for about one month. Each slave published their sensor data every 15 minutes and it never missed any packet. |
I created two very minimalistic files in my fork of your project here: https://github.com/joedupa/BatteryNode/tree/master/lost_packets_test
|
First of all thank you for creating test sketches to debug lost packets. I never thought of doing this kind of test. I went down only 5 minutes sleep time when I tested it last year. I can confirm that it is losing packets with one second sleep time as you experienced with your test sketches. I remember I implemented basic acknowledgement from Gateway to sender device before but somewhere along the way I removed it to make it simpler one way communication. According to that logic sender device will keep sending sensor data by restarting itself until Gateway acknowledged the receipt of the data.
And in gateway I had acknowledgement sent like this from within proberequest function:
|
There are some added features to the code. It seems more reliable now. If you want to test now use code in example folder for gateway and remote. Now it uses only 45 millisecond to transmit 6 bytes. |
nice concept - thank you for your work. But concerning reliability I am still looking for a firmware providing an ack concept with resend of lost or corrupted packets. This might be not needed when sending temperature or similar values, but important when monitoring security relevant sensors like gates, doors etc. |
(the title should read support/development) Hi, are you planning to continue with this project in the future? I am finding it very intriguing, I made it working for my project, but need your wisdom on a couple of issues I encountered. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: