You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.
The relationship between the amount and fee columns in the exchanges table is counterintuitive. Reticketing from #1118 (comment):
I'd like to to continue the discussion about what would be the principle of least surprise regarding the exchanges table.
The least surprising would be if both payins and payouts behaved the same. I'd like to be able to do either one of
balance = balance + amount - fee
balance = balance + amount
not depending on the sign of the amount. It does not really matter which one. The first variant behaves like when we are taking the fee of the balance. The second variant behaves like the user pays the fee before the money reaches gittip or after it has left. Both are fine choices.
The relationship between the amount and fee columns in the exchanges table is counterintuitive. Reticketing from #1118 (comment):
Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: