We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello, the following setup returns negative prices for european barrier calls:
import tf_quant_finance as tff import numpy as np n_points=10 spots = np.linspace(0.01, 0.2, n_points) strikes = 1.9 * np.ones(n_points) volatilities = 0.25 * np.ones(n_points) expiries = 0.5 * np.ones(n_points) barriers = 0.5 * np.ones(n_points) is_barrier_down = np.array([True] * n_points) is_knock_out = np.array([True] * n_points) is_call_options = np.array([True] * n_points) args = { "volatilities" : volatilities, "strikes" : strikes, "expiries" : expiries, "spots" : spots, "barriers" : barriers, "is_barrier_down" : is_barrier_down, "is_knock_out" : is_knock_out, "is_call_options" : is_call_options, } price = tff.black_scholes.barrier_price( **args ) >> price >> <tf.Tensor: shape=(10,), dtype=float64, numpy= array([-4.62000000e-01, -3.81777778e-01, -3.01555556e-01, -2.21341484e-01, -1.41989785e-01, -7.20212532e-02, -2.70513904e-02, -7.63614881e-03, -1.71392373e-03, -3.24709866e-04])>
The parameters are obviously contrived, but i wonder whether this is expected behavior in such tails due to numerical instabilities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello,
the following setup returns negative prices for european barrier calls:
The parameters are obviously contrived, but i wonder whether this is expected behavior in such tails due to numerical instabilities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: