-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking status of doctest passing on all Octave doc strings #188
Comments
This issue seems as good as any, at least for high-level. I'll start editing a checklist into your first comment... |
It might be good to try a release candidate for 0.7.0 on Octave just to make sure we haven't broken anything that would hinder this effort... @mtmiller how do you actually do this? In the source tree after building?
I get a lot of stuff like
And maybe we shouldn't be testing both |
Yeah, I don't really remember how I did it before, but here's a way that works whether or not Octave is already installed, I think this gets pretty close to all documented functions. In the build tree
or in a running installed Octave
|
Thanks! I tried the 0.7.0 RC with Octave 6.0.0 install,, checked out today:
With doctest-0.6.1:
So no significant differences between 0.6.1 and 0.7.0, which is good. |
It will be highly useful if all of Octave's core doc strings pass with doctest. Let's track the overall completion status of that goal here. That includes doctest issues that are blockers, Octave upstream issues preventing this, and lists of individual Octave doc strings that need to be worked on.
format
(tests can change the default output format options #183)doctest .
in hg checkout?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: