Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup Automated builds on Dockerhub #139

Open
jocelynthode opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Setup Automated builds on Dockerhub #139

jocelynthode opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@jocelynthode
Copy link

Hey,

I recently saw that we have added a workaround for the lvm2 bug that caused issues on #128 .

I see that the 4u1 as well as latest have not been rebuilt to take into account these fixes.

First @humblec could you rebuild these so that I can test and confirm that #128 is indeed fixed by the downgrade please ?

Secondly, I think we should setup on Dockerhub a GitHub integration that would trigger an image build everytime something is pushed to the branch as explained here (https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/builds/)

We could have automated builds for every branch you support for example, every time there is a commit on the gluster-4.1 branch this would trigger a build for the tag 4u1_centos7. Everytime there is a commit on master, this would trigger a build for the tag latest etc.

This would remove the need to open an issue each time we need you to rebuild the image.

What do you think ?

@jocelynthode
Copy link
Author

@humblec Hey could you give us an answer on this topic please ?

@humblec
Copy link

humblec commented Jun 3, 2019

@jocelynthode this was working smoothly and in one stage it became broken. Let me take a look at this in deep. I will get back,

@jocelynthode
Copy link
Author

@humblec Any news ?

@kobusvdm
Copy link

kobusvdm commented Aug 17, 2019

@humblec any update? Running into the lvm2 issue (installing OKD v3.11) that was fixed in February.

@renich
Copy link

renich commented Mar 11, 2020

I'm interested in this too. GlusterFS is becoming unusable in k8s. :S

@amarts
Copy link
Member

amarts commented Mar 11, 2020

I'm interested in this too. GlusterFS is becoming unusable in k8s. :S

While this repo may take some more time (depending on MAINTAINERs cycles) to sort out things, If you are looking at having Gluster in Container native way in k8s, try kadalu.io project too. It has the latest glusterfs-7.3 version in its storage servers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants