Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request for BIP 44 #290

Open
Hoodie-Kang opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feature Request for BIP 44 #290

Hoodie-Kang opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Hoodie-Kang
Copy link

Hoodie-Kang commented Feb 5, 2024

Hi,

Are there any plans to support BIP44?
If so, please let me know.

I would really appreciate it.

Thanks

@cychuang0924
Copy link
Contributor

cychuang0924 commented Feb 19, 2024

Hi, @Hoodie-Kang ,
In the short term, we should only be maintaining this library, and our current resources do not allow for the development of new or larger features. I apologize for any inconvenience!
Thanks for your suggestion!

@aboozaid
Copy link

aboozaid commented Jan 17, 2025

Hi, @Hoodie-Kang , In the short term, we should only be maintaining this library, and our current resources do not allow for the development of new or larger features. I apologize for any inconvenience! Thanks for your suggestion!

There is already a step taken by implementing bip32 on Alice, What do you think if we need a way to generate many child address as (watch-only or receive addresses) and only transfer their tokens by using (base address) on signing process. I explain it in details here 303

It would be cool to support that on Alice and it's really a needing feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants