Value of type concept field is inconsistent

[strogonoff]

This concept has type:

osgeo-glossary/concepts/concept-32.yaml

Lines 1 to 14 in e2b4e93

	---
	term: Cartography
	termid: 32
	eng:
	id: 32
	term: Cartography
	definition: Set of operations and processes that take part in the creation, edition
	and analysis of maps.
	language_code: eng
	notes: []
	examples: []
	type: term
	comments:
	- TMG_NP

This concept doesn’t have type:

osgeo-glossary/concepts/concept-105.yaml

Lines 1 to 11 in 862c737

	term: EASIG
	termid: 105
	eng:
	id: 105
	term: EASIG
	definition: Enterprise Architecture Special Interest Group
	language_code: eng
	notes: []
	examples: []
	authoritative_source:
	link: 'https://www.opengeospatial.org/acronyms'

Method definition: https://github.com/geolexica/osgeo-termbase/blob/565819ab9c2ba4408cc442f623a6a3c1039102a5/lib/osgeo/termbase/term.rb#L172-L177

[strogonoff]

cc’ing @ronaldtse though I guess it’s just a symptom of early stage data gathering

[ronaldtse]

Indeed, this is due to early data gathering. Concept 105 is type: abbrev because it's an abbreviation.

[skalee]

I suppose this is outdated and we should close it. Objections, @strogonoff, @ronaldtse?

Grepping with grep -e 'type:' -r osgeo-glossary/concepts --no-filename | uniq gives only: type: expression.

---

Abbreviations are handled in a different way now (abbrev: true), full example below. If this is incorrect for Glossarist, please say a word @strogonoff.

term: 3-D Elevation Program
termid: 1
eng:
  id: 1
  language_code: eng
  notes: []
  examples: []
  authoritative_source:
    link: https://www.osgeo.org/initiatives/geo-for-all/geo-newsletters-archive/
  terms:
  - type: expression
    designation: 3-D Elevation Program
    normative_status: preferred
  - type: expression
    designation: 3DEP
    normative_status: preferred
    abbrev: true