Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity (obsoletion or taxon restriction) #29563

Open
ValWood opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Jan 21, 2025

I used

GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity
for S. pombe coq7

@sylvainpoux pointed out that this should be more correctly

GO:0160224 | 3-demethoxyubiquinone 3-hydroxylase (NADH) activity

but I notice that Rhea maps many coq7 (including human) to
GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity
https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/?query=rhea:50908

My question is, should GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity exist, and if so, should it be taxon restricted ?
There are only 2 EXP annotations

UniProtKB:O74826 | coq7 | enables | GO:0008682    3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity | ECO:0000315   IMP | PMID:18808426 |   | 284812 Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) | PomBase |  
UniProtKB:P75728 | ubiF | enables | GO:0008682    3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity | ECO:0000315   IMP | PMID:10802164 |   | 83333 Escherichia coli (strain K12) | EcoliWiki

I will. remove the PomBase annotation today.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 21, 2025

Image

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 21, 2025

Hi @pgaudet could you ask Rhe for feedback, and then assign back to me to action

@sylvainpoux
Copy link

Hi @ValWood,

Here is the content of coq7 in S.pombe:

CC FUNCTION: Catalyzes the hydroxylation of 2-polyprenyl-3-methyl-6-methoxy-1,4-benzoquinol (DMQH2) during ubiquinone biosynthesis. {EXP|Ref.3}· Also catalyzes the hydroxylation of the 5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-(all-trans-polyprenyl)benzoquinone at the C6 position and participates in the biosynthesis of ubiquinone. {MODM|HAMAP-Rule:MF_03194}
CC CATALYTIC ACTIVITY
Reaction=a 5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-(all-trans-polyprenyl)benzene-1,4-diol + AH2 + O2 = a 3-demethylubiquinol + A + H2O [Rhea:50908]
EC=1.14.99.60
Evidence={MODM|HAMAP-Rule:MF_03194, EXP|Ref.3}
CC CATALYTIC ACTIVITY
Reaction=a 5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-(all-trans-polyprenyl)benzoquinone + NADH + O2 = a 3-demethylubiquinone + NAD(+) + H2O [Rhea:81211]
EC=1.14.13.253
Evidence={MODM|HAMAP-Rule:MF_03194}
PhysiologicalDirection=Left-to-right [Rhea:81212] {MODM|HAMAP-Rule:MF_03194}

An old paper (PMID:18808426) showed this GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity. But according to a recent paper (PMID:38425362), COQ7 mediates GO:0160224 | 3-demethoxyubiquinone 3-hydroxylase (NADH) activity.

Thanks

Sylvain

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 21, 2025

I agree, as does the author of PMID:18808426, so the question is, should we have GO:0008682 in GO. If yes, I think it should probably be "only in prokaryotes"?

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 27, 2025

GO:0160224 was recently created, see #29305

GO:0008682 only mentions 'acceptor', without mentioning which. I think GO:0160224 should be a child of GO:0008682.

I am not sure why you propose the TC bacteria on GO:0008682; I dont find any papers describing the acceptor.

Does anyone know if there are acceptors other than NAD for this reaction?

@kaxelsen
Thanks, Pascale

@ValWood ValWood changed the title GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity (obsoletion or taxon restriction) Question: GO:0008682 | 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity (obsoletion or taxon restriction) Jan 27, 2025
@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 27, 2025

I was suggesting a taxon restriction "Never in eukaryotes" on GO:0008682 3-demethoxyubiquinol 3-hydroxylase activity
if it is a valid term (because it appears to have EXP annotations for bacteria). These might be incorrect. I have no clue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants