Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better output for target command #109

Open
grolu opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Better output for target command #109

grolu opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
component/gardenctl Gardener CLI kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage)

Comments

@grolu
Copy link
Contributor

grolu commented Feb 17, 2022

What would you like to be added:
Currently, the output for the target command is just a confirmation message. It would be better to output the current (new) target. Also, it should be possible to modify the output using output flags.
Maybe we can re-use the target view command logic, however we should then change the default behavior to output the target in one line.

Why is this needed:
It is not clear what the current target is after executing a target command.

@grolu grolu added component/gardenctl Gardener CLI kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension labels Feb 17, 2022
@petersutter
Copy link
Member

petersutter commented Mar 9, 2022

related #120

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) label Sep 6, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) and removed lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) labels May 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/gardenctl Gardener CLI kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants