We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On some oral argument sources, we can collect the "attorneys" field. Most recently seen in cadc by @flooie
cadc
There is a Docket.parties field, but those are objects, not strings.
Docket.parties
We should have in the Audio model an attorneys field, similar to the one existing on OpinionCluster:
courtlistener/cl/search/models.py
Lines 2591 to 2594 in ec8bc90
Another proposed modification to the Audio model: #4195
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
5th Circuit does too, but formatting isn't that great: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/oral-argument-information/oral-argument-recordings
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
On some oral argument sources, we can collect the "attorneys" field. Most recently seen in
cadc
by @flooieThere is a
Docket.parties
field, but those are objects, not strings.We should have in the Audio model an attorneys field, similar to the one existing on OpinionCluster:
courtlistener/cl/search/models.py
Lines 2591 to 2594 in ec8bc90
Another proposed modification to the Audio model: #4195
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: