You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to merge two multi-signatures whose sets of signatories intersect.
For instance, we have two sets of signatories $A = \{s_1, s_2\}$ and $B = \{s_2, s_3\}$, which respectively produced multi-signatures $\sigma_A$ and $\sigma_B$.
According to this Crypto Stack Exchange post, these two multi-signatures can be merged if we use the aggregated public key $pk = pk_1 + 2 pk_2 + pk_3$.
But how would this translate into code?
Would the let agg_multisig = bls_signatures::aggregate(&vec![multisig_A, multisig_B]).unwrap(); instruction work as is?
When calling bls_signatures::verify_messages(&agg_multisig, &messages, &pub_keys), do we have to add several times the public key of signatory 2 in pub_keys? Do we also have to put several times the message of signatory 2 in messages? Would the following work?
let pub_keys = vec![pub_key_1, pub_key_2, pub_key_2, pub_key_3];
let messages = vec![message_1, message_2, message_3];
let valid = bls_signatures::verify(&agg_multisig, &messages, &pub_keys);
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I want to merge two multi-signatures whose sets of signatories intersect.
For instance, we have two sets of signatories$A = \{s_1, s_2\}$ and $B = \{s_2, s_3\}$ , which respectively produced multi-signatures $\sigma_A$ and $\sigma_B$ .
According to this Crypto Stack Exchange post, these two multi-signatures can be merged if we use the aggregated public key$pk = pk_1 + 2 pk_2 + pk_3$ .
But how would this translate into code?
let agg_multisig = bls_signatures::aggregate(&vec![multisig_A, multisig_B]).unwrap();
instruction work as is?bls_signatures::verify_messages(&agg_multisig, &messages, &pub_keys)
, do we have to add several times the public key of signatory 2 inpub_keys
? Do we also have to put several times the message of signatory 2 inmessages
? Would the following work?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: