-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ TODO #258
Comments
Fastapi Upgrade Starlette to >=0.29.0,<0.33.0 Sqlmodel will support for Pydantic 2.0 |
I got an update push from fastapi but I'm watching https://github.com/encode/starlette/pulls and there are some amazing updates here, if they are merged Fastapi will need to continue to adapt Starlette-1.0.0, will these minor versions continue to be compatible? I'm not sure, but I don't want to consume time for minor versions. |
These projects share common developers, and we will continue to monitor them. |
That's so cool, a solid architecture . SQLModel is an ORM, we already have SQLA, what are your thoughts? Repo: here |
SQLModel is both an SQLAlchemy model and a Pydantic model, so there is a possibility to further merge and simplify 'models' and 'schemas'. We can keep an eye on this progress: |
I agree with you, but I'll decline the offer. Because SQLModel is not updated and fixed at a good pace and is missing documentation, in fact SQLModel was born here: https://github.com/tiangolo/pydantic-sqlalchemy to reduce manual schema definition and validation is great in my opinion; Although the number of stars for SQLModel is promising, the number of users for it is much lower than for SQLA, and to use SQLModel, the users have to learn it as well,unless SQLModel is really all over the place, I'd migrate to it |
OK, I agree with you |
It would be great if you could provide PR.
We've fully upgraded to Pydantic-V2, but we still have some unfinished business from V1 that we'll continue to push in V2!
News:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: