We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See 0bc1262
This new requirement has big implications for the workflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These dates could be all available from Lax I think. Is it possible ExeterPremedia can consume that data directly?
We could also look at whether this can be added automatically to the XML by the bot when it is processed.
Can we discuss on our next call agenda?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes lets chat about it on Tuesday - I did think option 1 would be easiest, but the need to add comments to versions would probably prevent that.
The main problem for Exeter would be PoA versions and picking up versions of PoA, and also the comments production would add.
This is also an issue for the PoA workflow too - if we do a V2 adding a comment about the change.
Melissa37
SowmyaMahadevan
ravi-exeter
No branches or pull requests
See 0bc1262
This new requirement has big implications for the workflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: