Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Meta] Obs-ds-hosted-services Integration enablement for 9.0.0 #12529

Open
14 tasks
gizas opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
14 tasks

[Meta] Obs-ds-hosted-services Integration enablement for 9.0.0 #12529

gizas opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
Team:obs-ds-hosted-services Label for the Observability Hosted Services team [elastic/obs-ds-hosted-services]

Comments

@gizas
Copy link
Contributor

gizas commented Jan 30, 2025

Based on the email, this meta issue aims to track the 9.0.0 enablement activities for all the integrations that belong to Obs-ds-hosted-services.

Main requirement is to update the version constrains of each related integration eg. version: "^8.17.0 || ^9.0.0"

Some sanity checks need to happen for all related packages

The minimum xpack.fleet.internal.registry.spec.min should be 3.0 for 9.0.0 migration. See info

Related Issues:

Integrations to update:

Cloud related

Cloudnative related

@gizas gizas added the Team:obs-ds-hosted-services Label for the Observability Hosted Services team [elastic/obs-ds-hosted-services] label Jan 30, 2025
@gizas
Copy link
Contributor Author

gizas commented Jan 30, 2025

Note:

See #12468 (comment)

First set temporarily the Kibana constraint ^9.0.0 for the packages and then revert it before merging. This way we will be sure that the pipeline checks will run for the 9.0.0 version. For any package, run the pipeline, fix any errors and then revert back the constrains

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team:obs-ds-hosted-services Label for the Observability Hosted Services team [elastic/obs-ds-hosted-services]
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant