You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I understood correctly, I see that pp in the result is the predicted probability of forgetting a word. So if pp is low, I should recommend a word associated with the pp as a user might have forgotten the word already. But from the result, I dont see associated word with pp. Then how can I recommend words to users?
And again, is my saying correct? (words with low pp values should be recommended)
Finally, I checked roughly the result and compared p (ground truth) and pp (prediction) and seemed to find that p and pp are quite not matching when they should. For example, when p is 0.0001 pp is 0.9999 and when p is 0.9999, pp is 0.0001. I saw this case quite often when I was skimming. But MAE shows it is very similar as your paper which means training is not broken. Is it normal that p and app are not so matching often? Should I still recommend repeating lexeme according to the pp values?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I understood correctly, I see that pp in the result is the predicted probability of forgetting a word. So if pp is low, I should recommend a word associated with the pp as a user might have forgotten the word already. But from the result, I dont see associated word with pp. Then how can I recommend words to users?
And again, is my saying correct? (words with low pp values should be recommended)
Finally, I checked roughly the result and compared p (ground truth) and pp (prediction) and seemed to find that p and pp are quite not matching when they should. For example, when p is 0.0001 pp is 0.9999 and when p is 0.9999, pp is 0.0001. I saw this case quite often when I was skimming. But MAE shows it is very similar as your paper which means training is not broken. Is it normal that p and app are not so matching often? Should I still recommend repeating lexeme according to the pp values?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: