Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: future of gem #83

Open
mcritchlow opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Question: future of gem #83

mcritchlow opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mcritchlow
Copy link

Hey @dchandekstark!

So I've heard there's an EZID/Datacite working group that's formed for folks who are transitioning from EZID to Datacite. The University of California system, however, is apparently sticking with EZID. So I'm looking into how we might keep your great gem here supported going forward.

I imagine that Duke is transitioning so Datacite, yes? If so, what are your thoughts on the best way to keep this gem going? We could fork into one of our UC organizations, such as UCSD's, or we could add other UC devs as collaborators here, or? I thought about maybe samvera-labs, but this gem will really only be relevant for the UC campuses, as far as I've been told.

@dchandekstark
Copy link
Member

Hi @mcritchlow!

Thanks for checking in. I'm glad someone out there finds this work useful. :) At Duke we are transitioning DOIs of course, but AFAIK we will continue to mint ARKs as well, so I would continue supporting this gem for that purpose. It seems unlikely, however, that I will actively work on it in the foreseeable future. Let me consult with folks here about the options you meantioned. In the meantime, PRs are welcome! If it gets to be too much to handle, I'll holler. And, of course, you're certainly free to fork the repo. We can touch base again down the road. I'll leave this issue open for that purpose.

@mcritchlow
Copy link
Author

That sounds like a great plan, thanks!. I should say at the moment there's no actionable changes needed, as far as I'm aware. So an onslaught of PR's isn't right around the corner :)

@awead
Copy link

awead commented Nov 2, 2018

Hi guys, I see I'm in good company here. At Penn State we're switching over to DataCite's EZ API, which is supposed to replace EZID. According to them, this gem supports their API. I'm assuming that this means because both DataCite and this gem support the EZID API, q.e.d. your gem supports DataCite.

Are either of you aware of that? And, more importantly, am I wrong?

@dchandekstark
Copy link
Member

Hey @awead! Yes, @jgondron contributed work for DataCite compatibility that was incorporated into v1.8.0 (https://github.com/duke-libraries/ezid-client/releases/tag/v1.8.0). We're not using DataCite at Duke, but we do still use EZID for ARKs. Please feel free to submit improvements!

@awead
Copy link

awead commented Nov 2, 2018

@dchandekstark sweet! That's awesome. We need to get off of EZID and on to DataCite by the end of this year, so you may see some PRs from either me or @Cam156. Thanks to you both for keeping this alive.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants