You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This comment: #56 (comment)
and the no_pnew branch (1db08dd)
represent the proposal of using assignable
temporaries under gcc with -fpermissive,
instead of placement new+(currently missing)
explicit lifetime management.
As gcc is finally supported, this can be
tried out. Needs to resolve the conflicts
with no_pnew branch first.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Whether or not this is interesting
if/when we switch to c++23 and use
explicit lifetime management, needs
to be evaluated. The aforementioned
comment states:
Even if the c++23
solution is applied, the alternatives will
remain still interesting, for example from
the gcc porting stand-point. They will then
migrate to https://github.com/dosemu2/fdpp/issues/225
This comment:
#56 (comment)
and the no_pnew branch (1db08dd)
represent the proposal of using assignable
temporaries under gcc with -fpermissive,
instead of placement new+(currently missing)
explicit lifetime management.
As gcc is finally supported, this can be
tried out. Needs to resolve the conflicts
with no_pnew branch first.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: