[Feature Request][Question] Bots to use Go Live. #3234
Replies: 28 comments 4 replies
-
|
Staff has said they won't be supporting video sending for bots. There is ongoing dialog tracking custom statuses for bots here: #1160 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Why won't this happen @z64 ? Any updates on this...? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@ethrx There’s been several comments about this from Discord staff in the Discord API server: https://discord.com/channels/81384788765712384/381887113391505410/697716600945639474 https://discord.com/channels/81384788765712384/381887113391505410/498217723462156298 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
see #1995 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What about the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That permission is only there for completeness so it isn't missing permissions, bots cannot use video even if they have the permission. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
while it's a useless permission, it probably shouldn't just disappear on the OAuth page |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Should this be closed for inactivity? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I believe it is still actively desired. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It is still actively desired,haha. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's still actively desired |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's still actively very desired |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Guys, please keep the discussion relevant. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Very desired feature, please allow it :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just joining in to express my support for such a feature to be added. I think it would greatly expand the possibilities that Discord bots currently have, especially when it comes to user interaction. I'm currently having to use a normal Discord account for video output which is video controlled by a separate bot. Just hoping something good can be done with it at some point. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
As you can see from the referenced conversations with staff, they currently have no plans and do not believe that others will be able to properly implement it presently. There is no need to come in here and voice your support of the feature. They know people want it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
dont care didn't ask |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've been prototyping something similar to this with DiscordPHP but still waiting on some of ReactPHP filesystem's dependencies to get updated to support PHP 8. It should be possible to do it directly within a bot without going through discord's API, which is the best possible scenario right now until Discord decides that this is something they wish to pursue. https://sergeyzhuk.me/2017/07/17/reatcphp-http-server/ (not mine, but a similar article) has a nice tutorial for how to do this already, so on a Linux system it would be trivial to spawn a child process and then share a link to the server:port with a user. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
would be super nice to have this, they added voice so why not video. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I want this feature very much. As a developer, I think it would be easy to implement similar to a webcam. It frustrates me that I need to use a second account to stream party games, when this could be done by a bot. I could allow my users to remote activate jackbox games with commands. Please add the functionality |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@OGZamasu they have previously stated there are challenges with implementing such a thing - see #1995 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@TwilightZebby Regardless, I think its a lazy response, and I still want support for it in the future. They can say they won't do it. I can still say I want it. Squeaky wheel gets the oil. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Aaaand they locked the thread... I guess it's not happening |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What even is this about? what thread was locked? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They locked the issue located here: #1386 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That issue was moved to this discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Handling video buffers won't be something easy and require a lot of effort outside. And it may also be a problem to handle a large number of buffers at the end of Discord. But not impossible though, maybe in future sometime. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
this feature could be really good, but alternative solutions to this exist, Discord can't be used for everything you ever wanted |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I would personally only be interested in the metadata around users Discord live streaming instead of trying to have my bot itself go live:
Which would allow me to make custom posts something like the following: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Haven't Discord's Video capabilties stabilized? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My solution: Activities. Why don't you let the dev stream an html document or an website, the rest can be handled by the devs |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
you can make activities |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
-
I know this is far fetched but there's so many things we could do with that.
The question is: When will bots be able to use the custom status endpoint?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions