You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to better handle keyword collisions. Some of this work has been done, but it's spotty. We currently really only handle keyword collisions in record/variant members. But, we don't handle collisions when the record/variant itself has a name that would collide.
This is further complicated by the fact that certain keywords are only problems in certain places. For example, in Azle, TS keywords are valid as object keys, but invalid for Record/Variant names.
So, this will require more planning to come up with a scalable solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to better handle keyword collisions. Some of this work has been done, but it's spotty. We currently really only handle keyword collisions in record/variant members. But, we don't handle collisions when the record/variant itself has a name that would collide.
This is further complicated by the fact that certain keywords are only problems in certain places. For example, in Azle, TS keywords are valid as object keys, but invalid for Record/Variant names.
So, this will require more planning to come up with a scalable solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: