Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider what other types should be in CandidTypes #71

Open
lastmjs opened this issue May 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider what other types should be in CandidTypes #71

lastmjs opened this issue May 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement Improves behavior of existing functionality research No code will be deployed, deliverable is knowledge

Comments

@lastmjs
Copy link
Member

lastmjs commented May 3, 2023

Why is Opt not in CandidTypes? Tuples are there, funcs are there, then why not Opts? Something seems inconsistent. Also, we should consider renaming that struct to specify that it's meant to capture the stand-alone defined candid types.
@dansteren dansteren added enhancement Improves behavior of existing functionality research No code will be deployed, deliverable is knowledge labels Jun 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Improves behavior of existing functionality research No code will be deployed, deliverable is knowledge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dansteren @lastmjs