Improve ontology documentation

[jimkont]

We should improve the ontology documentation where possible with additional links to external definitions.

@pfps suggested we link the related Wikipedia pages which is an obvious choice.
Is rdfs:seeAlso sufficient? e.g.
dbo:Person rdfs:seeAlso <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person>

[kurzum]

should be something more specific that rdfs:seeAlso, we can also use our own vocab. An initial mapping can be found here:
https://code.google.com/p/lexo/source/browse/trunk/lexo2/data/dbpedia_ontology_mapping.txt

[pfps]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

rdfs:seeAlso has such a weak name.

I think that rdfs;isDefinedBy would be better, or something new.

The benefit of rdfs:isDefinedBy is that it might be possible in the future
to serve up real definitions.

peter

On 03/05/2015 06:32 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:

We should improve the ontology documentation where possible with
additional links to external definitions.

@pfps https://github.com/pfps suggested we link the related Wikipedia
pages which is an obvious choice. Is |rdfs:seeAlso| sufficient? e.g.
|dbo:Person rdfs:seeAlso https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person|

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU+IGSAAoJECjN6+QThfjzo0EH/AsO9YYldWRutnpvU6q+Jxge
w/CP3eq1bm1W3G1IZdgOgeainXNOE+R89C+YotZtM6amL2MTMh2lC1IbBCVKOsLB
9WPap2bfclHS8yGRYo/s6083SgEPItCKDAEYoC7tv5KBvfSNPAFAwvXmQMzH7iqz
1lAvEZmPbouA+D704j8RDufL7tpC/Y/eHWnRnfocdaLdCWkPT8B2dSK8uYv8q5Lp
ZqDwpIzing41TG4rNoFZAa4GSbp1eFW5ejPQ7NezIUTY6/y1Ds/fXe+j6hAo+QTG
5fl9+RgVsj6Xmx2UOM3tgX2WXtY6DKtPUhE3enKdPfvpbHmn4kUpgta2dDwcKmA=
=VuiZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[jimkont]

what about dbo:classDocumentation as an object property that links to other definition resources. For text descriptions we can use the existing label & comments.

[jimkont]

@kurzum are these definitions manually curated?
@alexandrutodor would it be easy to import them with your script? (when there is no English comment in an existing class)