You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pros for those -- include in consistent testing across setups and against datalad.
edit 1: collected some timing on running tests in standalone build vs static vs what we have in debian (prior version but should be similar if not the same), it seems that there is benefit even over debian one
❯ wc -l git-annex-test-*.out
1460 git-annex-test-debian-10.20240927.out
1460 git-annex-test-standalone.out
1460 git-annex-test-static.out
4380 total
❯ tail -n 1 git-annex-test-*.out
==> git-annex-test-debian-10.20240927.out <==
All tests succeeded. (Ran 50 test groups in 19s)
==> git-annex-test-standalone.out <==
All tests succeeded. (Ran 50 test groups in 55s)
==> git-annex-test-static.out <==
All tests succeeded. (Ran 50 test groups in 17s)
next would be to check on datalad tests which are known to be extremely slow against standalone build of git-annex.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Per https://git.kyleam.com/static-annex/about/ by @kyleam .
Pros for those -- include in consistent testing across setups and against datalad.
edit 1: collected some timing on running tests in standalone build vs static vs what we have in debian (prior version but should be similar if not the same), it seems that there is benefit even over debian one
next would be to check on datalad tests which are known to be extremely slow against standalone build of git-annex.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: