-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First Release Discussion #54
Comments
I see the docs checked off but there is no link to generated docs in the readme (readthedocs?). I would also add in just a little more info to the readme. |
Thanks. Added links in aae15bd |
@moody-marlin I think the 4th item ( Will you have a chance to work on / sketch out what's needed for the statistical output sometime this week? I have some time on Friday that I could use to cut a release. |
Hey @TomAugspurger - really sorry about the radio silence on my end; I have time to knock off the other checkboxes before Friday (tonight or tomorrow night). (For the initialization For the statistical output, I have time to sketch something out for sure, but I don't want to promise a strongly validated set of statistical outputs before Friday, if that makes sense. I.e., it will be a first pass to include a statistic or two, and provide the framework for including more, but it will still need to be checked and double checked to be airtight. |
Sounds good. My free time has evaporated (funny how that happens) so it'll be next week at the earliest anyway. |
Cool cool, that works for me too (traveling yet again); working on it over here for anyone interested. |
late to the party here. I am happy to pick-up some work for the release if it doesnt come in the way of @TomAugspurger and @moody-marlin |
Ideally we would have something by scipy, as I think you have a talk
scheduled :) I'll be busy the rest of the week, but can take a look early
next week to see where we are.
…On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Hussain Sultan ***@***.***> wrote:
late to the party here. I am happy to pick-up some work for the release if
it doesnt come in the way of @TomAugspurger
<https://github.com/tomaugspurger> and @moody-marlin
<https://github.com/moody-marlin>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#54 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHIrtlBnfw_hrf6VpaffeqydGplyItks5sIXKdgaJpZM4NYFuN>
.
|
I put a 0.1.0 up on PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/dask-glm/ Let me know if you'd like to be added as a maintainer. |
@TomAugspurger yea you can put me down as a maintainer! |
Thanks Chris. Do you have an account on https://pypi.python.org/pypi?
…On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Chris White ***@***.***> wrote:
@TomAugspurger <https://github.com/tomaugspurger> yea you can put me down
as a maintainer!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#54 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHIqEvYkz8v8bgdJgNlZX-Gh13qAMqks5sqAALgaJpZM4NYFuN>
.
|
Just got one: https://pypi.org/user/moody-marlin/ |
@TomAugspurger has mentioned having a first release soon; I'd like to collect the things that we think are blocking that from happening at this moment and check them off the list (any of these left un-checked are open for anyone to work on):
p
-values for non-regularized problems)l1
regularization, don't donewton
)kwarg
to all algorithmsAnything else that I'm missing that we should have before a release?
cc: @hussainsultan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: