Docker names and content in deployment (deploy-compose.yml) are wrong and misleading

[ido777]

What happened?

Containers

• IMAGE=librechat-client
• NAME= LibreChat-NGINX
• Expected Content = frontend + nginx
• Actual Content = nginx

---

• IMAGE=ghcr.io/danny-avila/librechat-dev-api:latest
• NAME= LibreChat-API
• **Expected Content = updated backend **
• Actual Content = frontend + backend from latest github docker

Steps to Reproduce

inspect the files in the docker or read the docker file to understand what happens here

Nginx setup might have been

FROM nginx:1.21.1-alpine AS prod-stage
COPY ./client/nginx.conf /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf
COPY --from=client-build /app/client/dist /usr/share/nginx/html
CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"]

To comply with the current names.
This is not only misleading names, but moreover as of today Dockerfile.multi creates 2 different images since the nginx image does ot take anything from the above layer so if you run it to the end it will not give you the client + API at all, which is ANOTHER BUG

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

Relevant log output

No response

Screenshots

No response

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[fuegovic]

LibreChat-Nginx is indeed just Nginx+a custom config file in the librechat folder. Would using simply "Nginx" be a more suitable name? Maybe...

LibreChat uses a monolithic architecture, which is why the API container encompasses both frontend and backend components.

[ido777]

Added my suggestion, WDYT?

[ido777]

Here is what I suggest

• IMAGE= Nginx
• NAME= NGINX-Server
• Expected Content = nginx + nginx configuration
• Actual Content = nginx + nginx configuration

---

• IMAGE=ghcr.io/danny-avila/librechat-dev-api:latest
• NAME= Dockerized-App
• **Expected Content = frontend + backend pre-packed in this docker -regardless of my source code **
• **Actual Content = frontend + backend pre-packed in this docker -regardless of my source code **

[fuegovic]

"Dockerized-App" isn't a good container name, way too generic. I run a dozen "Dockerized-App" in my personal deployment 😉