You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What if rather than being closures, scales were object instances and invoked via scale.apply(x) (as opposed to scale(x))? Then it would be easier to augment a scale’s prototype, to reuse code in implementations, and make scales cheaper to instantiate. (The latter is especially relevant if we want immutable scales #121.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What if rather than being closures, scales were object instances and invoked via scale.apply(x) (as opposed to scale(x))? Then it would be easier to augment a scale’s prototype, to reuse code in implementations, and make scales cheaper to instantiate. (The latter is especially relevant if we want immutable scales #121.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: