You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using the code provided by the authors I was unable to get results consistent with those in the paper, with Spearman correlations of only 0.75 (CIfar10), 0.73 (CIfar100), and 0.68 (Imagenet16-120) for the three datasets on NASbench201.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We supplemented the experimental results obtained. We don’t know where the problem lies. All computation on AZ score used the code provided by the authors.
Using the code provided by the authors I was unable to get results consistent with those in the paper, with Spearman correlations of only 0.75 (CIfar10), 0.73 (CIfar100), and 0.68 (Imagenet16-120) for the three datasets on NASbench201.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: