You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off: Thank you so much for this awesome tool/data. I'm not sure it is under active development any more, but it should be if it isn't!
Geographic information on both the citing patents and the cited bibliographic publications would be a superb addition. It would help one track knowledge flows across space and across time (as of now, as far as I can tell, the best one can do is link patents to their patent office applications. In principle, I believe there is a way to link some of these records back to PATSTAT but it appears a bit involved.
I of course know de minimis about the data pipeline, but, for citing patents, there is likely inventor and/or applicant location information wherever the raw patent data is coming from and of course there is de Rassenfosse et al. (2019) for more carefully geo-located patent data (I believe de Rassenfosse and perhaps others on that paper are/were involved in this project).
For cited academic publications, I can see that being tougher, but, in principle, the author affiliations should be useful in "geo-locating." Indeed, in a nonstandard format, it appears the table bibliographical_reference documents, when it can, the affiliation location. There is also a location field under "event" but I'm not 100% certain what "event" refers to here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First off: Thank you so much for this awesome tool/data. I'm not sure it is under active development any more, but it should be if it isn't!
Geographic information on both the citing patents and the cited bibliographic publications would be a superb addition. It would help one track knowledge flows across space and across time (as of now, as far as I can tell, the best one can do is link patents to their patent office applications. In principle, I believe there is a way to link some of these records back to PATSTAT but it appears a bit involved.
I of course know de minimis about the data pipeline, but, for citing patents, there is likely inventor and/or applicant location information wherever the raw patent data is coming from and of course there is de Rassenfosse et al. (2019) for more carefully geo-located patent data (I believe de Rassenfosse and perhaps others on that paper are/were involved in this project).
For cited academic publications, I can see that being tougher, but, in principle, the author affiliations should be useful in "geo-locating." Indeed, in a nonstandard format, it appears the table bibliographical_reference documents, when it can, the affiliation location. There is also a location field under "event" but I'm not 100% certain what "event" refers to here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: