You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please describe the use case that requires this feature.
Currently we just average the single telescope predictions on the sky.
This is not optimal, since it will happily average a telescope with wrongly reconstructed sign of disp with another with correctly reconstructed sign resulting in a very bad prediction.
There are multiple ways to combine disp predictions for multiple telescopes, e.g. taking the average of the closest positions taking both possibilities of sign into account.
Some where looked at in @LukasNickel Master's thesis.
Describe the solution you'd like
Implement improved combination of telescope-wise disp prediction into subarray prediction.
Additional context
This method seems to provide better performance for low multiplicities than HillasReconstructor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please describe the use case that requires this feature.
Currently we just average the single telescope predictions on the sky.
This is not optimal, since it will happily average a telescope with wrongly reconstructed sign of disp with another with correctly reconstructed sign resulting in a very bad prediction.
There are multiple ways to combine disp predictions for multiple telescopes, e.g. taking the average of the closest positions taking both possibilities of sign into account.
Some where looked at in @LukasNickel Master's thesis.
Describe the solution you'd like
Implement improved combination of telescope-wise disp prediction into subarray prediction.
Additional context
This method seems to provide better performance for low multiplicities than HillasReconstructor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: