Problem: solomachine and ibc-go are outdated

[mmsqe]

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

• Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.61%. Comparing base (69a8c50) to head (355827e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1089      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   34.23%   36.61%   +2.38%     
==========================================
  Files          93      101       +8     
  Lines       14151    14396     +245     
==========================================
+ Hits         4844     5271     +427     
+ Misses       8365     8174     -191     
- Partials      942      951       +9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration_tests	25.70% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_byzantine	11.24% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_gov	11.51% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_grpc	11.51% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_ibc	27.43% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_ledger	11.49% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_slow	11.49% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_solomachine	11.28% <ø> (ø)
integration_tests_upgrade	11.51% <ø> (ø)
unit_tests	12.01% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mmsqe]

just follow the error message, previous ci was failed

[yihuang]

actually persist-credentials: false should be better practice, and it seems to work too: #1090