Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lower lockbot timeframe and add comment. #850

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024
Merged

Lower lockbot timeframe and add comment. #850

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

jezdez
Copy link
Member

@jezdez jezdez commented Nov 16, 2023

Resolves #849.

Description

The reasoning here is that some older tickets in the conda org have been waiting to be locked for a long time. We need to point out to new participants that there is a way forward instead of piling on, especially if the old issues were open-ended and no decision was made in the past. It's worth opening new issues instead.

@jezdez jezdez requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2023 10:09
@conda-bot conda-bot added the cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA label Nov 16, 2023
dbast
dbast previously approved these changes Nov 16, 2023
chenghlee
chenghlee previously approved these changes Nov 16, 2023
@kenodegard
Copy link
Contributor

We removed the lockbot comment to decrease noise: #547

@jezdez
Copy link
Member Author

jezdez commented Aug 8, 2024

@kenodegard is it still worth lowering the timeout for locking closed issues?

@kenodegard
Copy link
Contributor

A whole year is probably overkill so lowering it makes sense but a month feels a little short (especially since our releases are bi-monthly). Maybe 3 or 6 months?

As for the lockbot comment, I'm pretty sure we should not add that back.

@jezdez jezdez dismissed stale reviews from chenghlee and dbast via d5f3f87 August 14, 2024 12:12
@jezdez
Copy link
Member Author

jezdez commented Aug 14, 2024

A whole year is probably overkill so lowering it makes sense but a month feels a little short (especially since our releases are bi-monthly). Maybe 3 or 6 months?

As for the lockbot comment, I'm pretty sure we should not add that back.

Okay, I've used 180 days.

@jezdez jezdez requested a review from kenodegard August 14, 2024 12:12
@jezdez jezdez merged commit e171b63 into main Aug 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@jezdez jezdez deleted the lockbot-conduct branch August 14, 2024 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lower time for lockbot to be active
6 participants