Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking issue for improving test coverage for search #1509

Open
2 tasks
Oaphi opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1513
Open
2 tasks

Tracking issue for improving test coverage for search #1509

Oaphi opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1513
Assignees
@Oaphi
Labels
area: testing Changes to testing infrastructure complexity: average Not particularly hard, not particularly trivial.

Comments

@Oaphi
Copy link
Member

Oaphi commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

#1507 highlighted that our testing coverage for search-related functionality is a bit lacking. This issue exists to track improvements to it to prevent such issues going forward.

  • add tests for the SearchHelper helper;
  • add integration / system tests for search;
@Oaphi Oaphi added complexity: average Not particularly hard, not particularly trivial. area: testing Changes to testing infrastructure labels Jan 9, 2025
@Oaphi Oaphi self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@Oaphi Oaphi linked a pull request Jan 12, 2025 that will close this issue
Draft
@Oaphi Oaphi linked a pull request Jan 13, 2025 that will close this issue
Improvements for search test coverage #1513
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Oaphi Oaphi

Labels
area: testing Changes to testing infrastructure complexity: average Not particularly hard, not particularly trivial.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Improvements for search test coverage codidact/qpixel
1 participant
@Oaphi